[identity profile] awriter12.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] writers_loft
Wow, I actually think this may be my first (or one of my first) post(s) here. Hmm.
Well anyways I shall get on to the point.
The story I am working on right now is telling me to be written into parts. Like Part one, Part Two, Part three type of thing in the same book. Kind of like what Kristin Cashore does in Graceling and what Stephenie Meyer did in Breaking Dawn (cept she had different points of views)
So this is where my question comes, does it bother you if a book is split into parts or other "books" within that book? Or do you prefer it so it separates some things in the book better?

Date: 2009-03-01 04:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baltimoreandme.livejournal.com
I think it depends, as you've suggested, on the structure of the story -- some books are easily divided into three (or 2, or 5, etc.) parts, while in others this sort of division would seem jarring or pointless.

The basic question is this: does splitting the story into books or parts add to the reader's understanding -- does it communicate something about the narrative that would otherwise not be communicated? If it does, split it up. If not, leave it unbroken.

Date: 2009-03-01 05:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] its-a-sekrit.livejournal.com
For me, it depends on whether or not it serves a purpose to the story.

Does it add to the story if you separate it? Does it detract from the story if you separate it?

What purpose do you think it serves?

Date: 2009-03-02 02:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jinkang.livejournal.com
One thing I thought up: if the first part is like an introductory part, it's still a story right?

It's a silly question but worth answering, I think.

If you divide the story into two and while the second part is rollicking fun, but the first part is all introductory...then you may need to make some changes to the first part.

I think overall, you'd be the best of the judge in the end. If you divide them up, do they need additional parts? troubles for the protagonists? more 'events'?

And once you have added them, would they stand on their own as it's own book. Because it's one thing to have two separate books, it's another story when said readers MUST read the first book to understand the second. It's tricky but you shouldn't force readers to read the first one. Never.

Good luck.

Date: 2009-03-03 03:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jinkang.livejournal.com
Sorry for not understanding earlier. I have read some books that follow such division so I'm sure readers won't get lost.

I am reading up on the 'Techniques of the Selling Writer' and Dwight actually mentions you can smoothly carry the passage of the time in a paragraph, if needs be, without resorting to any division.

Granted, I am not good at it so I usually use '###' in my short stories but what he writes in that book look pretty awesome. Haha.

Just another option to consider; it never hurts.

Good luck.

Profile

For Writers of Original Fiction

January 2018

S M T W T F S
  123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
282930 31   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 2nd, 2025 05:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios